[mfgamembers] FYI: An Act to protect Massachusetts pollinators

[Daniel Cooley]

I totally agree. This is an attempt to get the camel’s nose into the pesticide regulatory tent. As Mo, Brad and others have said, we have a system. We should use it.

Dan


> On Jan 18, 2018, at 6:56 PM, Franklyn Carlson <fcarlson at carlsonorchards.com> wrote:
> 
> Well spoken Mo.  These are very delicate topics as we deal with this type of thing often.  Clear heads must prevail.
> Frank
>  
> From: mfgamembers [mailto:mfgamembers-bounces at virtualorchard.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Wood
> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2018 1:11 PM
> To: maurice tougas <appleman.maurice at gmail.com>
> Cc: MFGA Members <mfgamembers at virtualorchard.com>; <brad at mfbf.net> <brad at mfbf.net>
> Subject: Re: [mfgamembers] FYI: An Act to protect Massachusetts pollinators
>  
> This isn't flying off the hook. Obviously, this doesn't affect us directly, but I entirely agree with Mo.
> S.W.
> 
> Stephen M. Wood, Farnum Hill Ciders/Poverty Lane Orchards, Lebanon, NH 
>                (603) 252-5696    swood at farnumhillciders.com <mailto:swood at farnumhillciders.com>
>  
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> On Jan 18, 2018, at 12:51 PM, maurice tougas <appleman.maurice at gmail.com <mailto:appleman.maurice at gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> PS
>  
> You all know that I've been know to fly off the hook now and then. You been reminded!
>  
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 12:49 PM, maurice tougas <appleman.maurice at gmail.com <mailto:appleman.maurice at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Jon
>  
> My quick reading suggests to me that there is more to this than the text of the bill suggests. Looks to me that someone is attempting to lay groundwork for using the legislature to take over the role of the pesticide board in the registering of materials. In other words, make the approval process a political one rather than scientific one. There is a reason tjhat applicators are being exempted during the "blooming period" which happens to coincide with the growing season.The reason is to highlight the "bloom" for emotional purposes. Is there a use for neonics other than during the period of March 1 to October 31? Maybe there is? Since nursery plants are excluded then greenhouse plants are as well excluded?
>  
> Wouldn't simply making them restricted use accomplish all that the bill is suggesting, with the scientific review process that the pesticide subcommittee, which is chaired by public health and not MDAR, being the logical and credible body making this decision? I think this is an attempt to circumvent the scientific process to be supplanted by the political process. 
>  
> Just my two cents, and you didn't even pay that! 
>  
> Mo
>  
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 11:45 AM, Jon Clements <jmcextman at gmail.com <mailto:jmcextman at gmail.com>> wrote:
> https://malegislature.gov/Bills/190/H4041 <https://malegislature.gov/Bills/190/H4041>
>  
> Does anyone have any concerns/issues with this? (Besides being another regulation.)
>  
> The way I read it, pretty minimal impact to most apple/peach growers unless you are NOT a certified applicator. In summary, it means:
> During and after blooming season, neonicotinoids “shall only be sprayed, 38 released, deposited or applied by a certified commercial applicator, a certified private applicator, 39 or a licensed applicator.”
> Blooming season is defined as: “the period of the calendar year during which blooming or flowering plants are actively blooming, which shall include, at a minimum, the period between March 1 and October 31, provided, that the department may increase the period of time by regulation.”
> During bloom time, neonicotinoids may be applied (by the above listed groups) only for agricultural and horticultural uses as defined by Chapter 61A.
> Agricultural use defined here: https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartI/TitleIX/Chapter61A/Section1 <https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartI/TitleIX/Chapter61A/Section1> .
>  
> Horticultural use defined here: https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartI/TitleIX/Chapter61A/Section2 <https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartI/TitleIX/Chapter61A/Section2> .
>  
>  
> --
> JMCEXTMAN (aka Jon Clements)
> 413.478.7219 <tel:(413)%20478-7219> Verizon
> 413.378.3068 <tel:(413)%20378-3068> Project Fi
> UMass Cold Spring Orchard
> 393 Sabin Street
> Belchertown, MA  01007
> http://umassfruit.com <http://umassfruit.com/>
>  
> _______________________________________________
> mfgamembers mailing list
> mfgamembers at virtualorchard.com <mailto:mfgamembers at virtualorchard.com>
> http://virtualorchard.com/mailman/listinfo/mfgamembers <http://virtualorchard.com/mailman/listinfo/mfgamembers>
> 
> 
>  
> -- 
> Maurice Tougas
> Tougas Family Farm
> Northborough,MA 01532
> 508-450-0844 <tel:(508)%20450-0844>
> 
> 
>  
> -- 
> Maurice Tougas
> Tougas Family Farm
> Northborough,MA 01532
> 508-450-0844
> _______________________________________________
> mfgamembers mailing list
> mfgamembers at virtualorchard.com <mailto:mfgamembers at virtualorchard.com>
> http://virtualorchard.com/mailman/listinfo/mfgamembers <http://virtualorchard.com/mailman/listinfo/mfgamembers>_______________________________________________
> mfgamembers mailing list
> mfgamembers at virtualorchard.com
> http://virtualorchard.com/mailman/listinfo/mfgamembers

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://virtualorchard.com/pipermail/mfgamembers/attachments/20180121/eae95d1f/attachment-0001.html>